Lisa Hanson, with the support of the NATF has now cornered the state actors in the Interchange Bistro case naming 20 defendants from THE STATE in 9 countersuits for nearly $200 million in damages which they will be liable for in their personal capacity in the Hanson court of common law.
Did you catch that? The Hansons are suing the STATE in a court of common law in STATE facilities where the judge is no longer sitting in his judicial capacity but rather has now been relegated to a 'ministerial' capacity which is essentially a 'traffic cop' just ensuring that things move smoothly as Lisa conducts her court. This fact alone is sufficient to disrupt the usurped control that all courts have been wielding for generations.
Now the strategy rolls out a pincer move and we begin to apply pressure on the second front in the 'court of public opinion. We're beginning to issue press releases exposing the shenanigans in the light of day. The STATE minions have nowhere to hide.
Kelly Martinez, the city prosecutor for Albert Lea Minnesota who has been 'chief in charge' of relentless malicious prosecution is incurring millions of dollars in liability for her employer, the city, in addition to her own liability and we're taking bets on how long it will be before she gets fired from her post. Here is the first Press Release of many to come.
https://m.albertleatribune.com/2021/03/owner-of-the-interchange-says-she-is-suing-city-attorney/
This course was previously available for $1500. It's yours now for free. Check it out and share the good news.
https://www.national-taskforce.org/irs
check out today's newsletter if you didn't get one already.
https://app.getresponse.com/view.html?x=a62b&m=BiJQ0A&mc=Jm&s=NCAARS&u=BFct0&z=EE5yzjc&
Here's one to remember: formally request from the judge in writing, perhaps in the form of a 'Conditional Acceptance' something to the effect that: :I accept your fine and will pay - conditional upon 'Judge Albatros' specifying to me in writing in what specie of payment the court is requiring payment in. He can't say US dollars, because that is defined as gold and isn't available and the law cannot require the impossible. He can't say Federal Reserve notes because that's not 'money' according to the constitution to which he has sworn an oath to uphold. In the end, when you understand the money issue, what we use for money is only 'credit'. You can issue your own credit by giving a promissory note. They can't say that credit issued by a private party is not acceptable because that's exactly what the Federal Reserve does. You get the idea. They have nowhere to turn. You've agreed to pay so you're not in contempt. You just need further instruction as to 'how' to pay and in...
